- Vatican catalogs its Hebrew manuscripts [JTA]: I’m really curious to see, after the Richard Williamson debacle, if this event goes ahead as planned January 30—the catalog “edited by the technical staff of the National Library of Israel, will be formally presented at an event Jan. 30 that will feature the Israeli ambassador to the Holy See as well as the Vatican librarian…”
- English and Arabic film reveals Journey to Mecca [Reuters]: “The first and only time an IMAX camera has captured an aerial view of the Haj from a helicopter hovering 200 feet above Mecca and the first time an IMAX team has been admitted into the most sacred sanctuary of Islam — the Grand Mosque at Mecca.” A dramatic portrayal of Ibn Battuta’s 14th century hajj combined with a documentary look at the contemporary one, this film opens at the Ontario Science Centre in Toronto on February 7; so far, it is only booked at a very limited number of theatres in the world, as you can see at the official site.
- S. Africa helps Mali modernise ancient libraries [Reuters]: “South Africa and Mali opened a high-tech library in the Malian desert town of Timbuktu on Saturday, boosting efforts to preserve thousands of ancient manuscripts documenting Africa’s academic past.” The article doesn’t address to what degree the library will be accessible to the public; I hope to find out more about this in the days to come.
- British museum director talking collections [The Sunday Times]: The British Museum is turning 250—”An extract from Neil MacGregor’s anniversary lecture where he reflects on the great works made by humans throughout history.” MacGregor makes the case for seeing the Museum as “the private collection of every citizen in the world.”
January 16, 2009
Sequenced by date of original publication.
January 14, 2009
Leave a Comment
I do enjoy it when one of these pitched academic battles bubbles up from arcane scholarship to the media surface.
In the new Jan 26/09 edition of The Nation, Anthony Grafton’s review of a 2008 academic-press volume—Morton Smith and Gershom Scholem: Correspondence, 1945-1982, by Guy G. Stroumsa, ed.—takes one more crack at the gay-Jesus/Secret Mark controversy, but with rather tentative conclusions:
I believe that Smith really found his letter, and that Scholem gave him the framework into which he inserted it. But that’s just what I think. Many will disagree. This time, the professor is the Cheshire cat. He smiles and is gone.
For one academic insider’s view of this story, check out these postings on Secret Mark, from Apocryphicity.
January 10, 2009
Leave a Comment
“For the record, here are the books I haven’t read on our list: Das Kapital, The Wealth of Nations, The Koran, Principia Mathematica, half of Freud’s entertaining but (to me) interminable Interpretation of Dreams, half of Galileo’s Starry Messenger and Other Dialogues, and most of Wollenstonecraft’s Vindication (dreary beyond measure).” — André Alexis
“Trying to decide impossibilities such as whether Shakespeare should be represented by Hamlet or King Lear gave me something approaching a mild migraine.” – A. L. Kennedy
“I was taken aback when both Virginia Woolf’s To The Lighthouse and Lytton Strachey’s Eminent Victorians were axed. I was unable to convince my colleagues that these books reshaped their genres, besides being more accessible than a couple of our final choices ( The Mahabharata, anyone?) Bloomsbury, I guess, now has as much traction as the Chicago School of Neo-cons.” – Charlotte Gray
“I sent my fellow-panelists a querulous note explaining that I wanted to write about a book penned by a woman. ‘I am not making this point to be politically correct, but because I do not see me and my reading tastes completely reflected in the list so far.’ Our Great Books looked too like the kind of history syllabus taught half a century ago — all wars and laws, chaps and maps — that had nearly put me off history for life.” – Charlotte Gray